Statutory Sick Pay 2024 and accurate time recording in Ireland
July 6, 2026 ยท 5 min
An employee in your Limerick warehouse takes five sick days. Your payroll office processes them at seventy percent of the hourly rate, applies the daily cap, and assumes the matter is closed. Three weeks later the worker asks why the calculation came out short, and references the Sick Leave Act. The HR director goes looking for the thirteen-week qualifying-service evidence that would defend the figure, and finds that nobody on the team ever assembled it. A WRC complaint follows, over a sum that, properly recorded, would never have been in dispute at all.
Statutory sick pay is recent enough in Ireland that many payroll teams still treat it as a simple percentage calculation. It is not simple. It is a percentage calculation resting on a stack of records, and if any layer of the stack is missing, the calculation cannot be defended.
The Sick Leave Act, in plain terms
The Sick Leave Act introduced statutory sick pay into Irish law for the first time. The current entitlement is five days a year, paid at seventy percent of the worker’s gross wage and subject to a daily cap. The scheme was designed to rise over time, though the planned increase has been paused at five days pending review, so an employer should treat five as the current figure and watch for the number to move.
Eligibility requires thirteen weeks of continuous service with the employer. The statutory days come from the worker’s entitlement under the Act, and an employer’s own contractual sick scheme can be more generous but never less. The employer has to keep records of the statutory sick pay taken and paid, retained for several years, and produce them to the Commission on request. Getting the payment wrong is a contravention of the Act, and the adjudication can award the unpaid amount plus compensation reaching into several months of pay. The enforcement pattern is consistent and instructive: the disputes are about records. The employer who cannot prove the qualifying service, or the daily-rate calculation, or that the sick day was actually taken, is the employer who loses.
Try GeoTapp free for 14 days
No credit card required. Get started in 2 minutes.
The Act lists the records plainly enough: the days of statutory sick leave taken, the rate paid, and whatever else regulations specify, kept for the retention period and produced on request. What trips employers is not that list, it is everything the list quietly depends on.
Follow the chain. The thirteen-week qualifying service depends on the start date and the continuity of service. The daily rate depends on the gross wage in the period before the sick leave. The gross wage depends on the hours worked. The hours depend on the time records. Every link has to hold for the calculation at the end of it to be defensible, and a chain is only as strong as the weakest record in it. A payroll team can apply seventy percent perfectly to a number that was wrong three links back.
Continuous service, where the dispute often lands
The thirteen weeks of continuous service is measured against the standard continuity rules of Irish employment law, and continuity is exactly the thing that gets murky in a real working history. A worker who had a brief break, a transfer between group companies, or a fixed-term contract that was renewed needs the platform to show the continuity correctly, because the obvious reading and the legally correct reading are not always the same.
A workforce platform that holds the start date, the contract history, the transfers and the leave periods in a single worker profile produces the continuity evidence on request. The HR team confirms the thirteen weeks against a record rather than a memory. The entitlement is calculated correctly the first time. And the worker accepts the payslip without reaching for the Act, which is the quietest possible outcome and the one worth designing for.
The habit that prevents the claim
The most common statutory-sick-pay claim is not the work of a difficult employee. It comes from a payroll team that processed the sick day without the records underneath it: the daily rate estimated, the qualifying service assumed, the medical certification not actually on file. The claim is a records failure wearing the costume of a pay dispute.
A workforce platform with an integrated absence flow captures all three at the moment the absence is logged. GeoTapp’s absence module records the sick day, runs the rate calculation against the platform’s own hourly-rate history, checks the qualifying-service flag, and writes the result back to payroll. An Irish employer who runs that flow once per absence has no claim to defend later. The employer who skips it, to save five minutes on a busy day, is the one who spends a fortnight at the Commission instead. Start a free fourteen-day trial, with no card, and make the sick-pay calculation something the records simply support.
How does your payroll process a statutory sick day today, against full records, or against an estimate and a hope? Tell us in the comments below. Statutory sick pay is new enough that few teams have settled the routine, and what you write helps other employers build one before a short calculation becomes a complaint.
Get articles like this in your inbox
Practical insights on GPS tracking, field operations and GDPR. No spam, just useful content.