Your finance director has just opened the HMRC determination on a contractor who has been billing the company for eighteen months. The status determination is inside IR35. The PAYE liability is backdated. The contractor is shouting at you on a call from Bristol. Somewhere in this mess sits the question you should have asked when the contract was signed: who controls when, where and how the work gets done, and how do you prove it?
The three IR35 tests, in plain English
Since the off-payroll reforms in 2017 (public sector) and 2021 (medium-large private sector), the engaging company is responsible for the IR35 determination, not the contractor. HMRC and the courts use three tests carried over from Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions (1968) and a long line of tribunal cases. The tests are mutuality of obligation, personal service (or right of substitution), and control.
Mutuality asks whether the engager is obliged to offer work and the worker is obliged to accept it. A contractor who can refuse the next project, and whom you can release without notice when the project ends, scores well on this. Personal service asks whether the contractor can send a qualified substitute. A genuine, unfettered right of substitution, exercised at least occasionally, is the strongest single indicator of outside-IR35 status.
Control is the test where GPS data cuts both ways. HMRC looks at who controls the what, the how, the when and the where. Light-touch direction (a deadline, a deliverable, a site to attend) is consistent with outside-IR35. Detailed supervision (start at 8am, log breaks, follow our method, sign off your finish time with the supervisor) is consistent with inside-IR35.
Compare two contractors side by side on light versus detailed supervision for one week, and watch the IR35 signal sharpen.
No credit card, up and running in 2 minutes.
Open your trial
How GPS tracking can push you the wrong way
If you make a contractor clock in and out of the same system as your employees, on the same geofence, with the same supervisor approval workflow, you have just handed HMRC a control signal. The contractor’s defence team will not enjoy explaining to the tribunal why the working arrangement looked operationally identical to employment.
Three patterns in particular tend to tip the determination. First, fixed start and finish times enforced by the platform. Second, supervisor approval of timesheets that goes beyond confirming the deliverable. Third, no real ability for a substitute to log in and complete the work without renegotiating the contract.






